Around-the-clock labor and delivery model compared with on-call coverage

Article

A study presented on February 16 at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) annual meeting in San Francisco, California, found that around-the-clock labor and delivery (L & D) coverage decreased the odds of cesarean delivery in certain populations of patients in California.

 

A study presented on February 16 at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) annual meeting in San Francisco, California, found that around-the-clock labor and delivery (L & D) coverage decreased the odds of cesarean delivery in certain populations of patients in California.

The study authors, from the University of California, San Francisco, and Oregon Health and Science University in Portland, Oregon, compared obstetric outcomes in hospitals with around-the-clock coverage with outcomes in hospitals whose coverage is based on need.

The retrospective cohort study examined the outcomes of single, term, live births in California between 2005 and 2006. Hospitals with fewer than 1200 deliveries per year were excluded. Of the total, 740,019 births met the study criteria.

Hospitals were categorized based on L & D clinician coverage as “around-the-clock” or “as-needed.” In all, 274,106 births (37%) took place in hospitals with around-the-clock coverage, and 465,913 births (63%) in hospitals with as-needed coverage.

The data showed that around-the-clock hospitals had fewer cesarean deliveries overall and fewer primary cesarean deliveries in both nulliparous and multiparous women.

The researchers found that the proportion of women who underwent a trial of labor after cesarean and who achieved vaginal birth after previous cesarean was higher in hospitals with around-the-clock coverage. Additionally, women were more likely to have labor induction with around-the-clock than as-needed coverage, although they still had lower odds of cesarean delivery.

“Whether the observed difference in outcome can be attributable to the implementation of a ‘laborist’ model,” the authors concluded, “deserves further investigation, particularly as more hospitals are considering such staffing changes.”

Cheng Y, Cassidy A, Darney B, Catrell E, Snowden J, Caughey A. Labor and delivery coverage: around-the-clock or as-needed? SMFM 2013; Abstract 80.

Recent Videos
Understanding cardiovascular risk factors in women | Image Credit: cedars-sinai.org.
Updated FLUBLOK label expands influenza vaccine options for pregnant women | Image Credit: mass-vaccination-resources.org
Sheryl Kingsberg, PhD: Psychedelic RE104 for postpartum depression
March of Dimes reports increase in maternity care desert prevalence | Image Credit: marchofdimes.org.
Discussing low-dose aspirin use for preeclampsia prevention | Image Credit: komodohealth.com
Addressing maternal health inequities: Insights from CDC's Wanda Barfield | Image Credit: cdc.gov
Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in brachial plexus birth Injury | Image Credit: shrinerschildrens.org
Innovations in prenatal care: Insights from ACOG 2024 | Image Credit:  uofmhealth.org.
raanan meyer, md
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.