A recent study highlighted a longer average pregnancy duration before abortion in states with bans, alongside increased travel time and costs.
Abortions reported later in pregnancy following statewide bans | Image Credit: © Parilov - © Parilov - stock.adobe.com.
The odds of undergoing abortion later in pregnancy are increased 2-fold in women residing in states with abortion bans, according to a recent study published in the American Journal of Public Health on June 25, 2025.1
Alongside a significant increase in second-trimester abortion bans, the data also highlighted a sharp rise in travel time and the prevalence of overnight stays. In comparison, carrying an unwanted pregnancy to term was reported in only 3% of participants.1
“Banning abortion doesn’t eliminate the need, it just forces people to travel farther and wait longer,” said Diana Greene Foster, PhD, senior study author and professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences at the University of Carolina, San Francisco.1
Abortion bans were implemented in 14 states following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision in 2022: Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Nearly 3 years later, the survey was conducted to compare experience of people seeking abortion care before vs after the bans.2
Self-administered surveys were provided to 855 individuals across the US states with abortion bans currently in place. Comparisons of travel by ban status were made using bivariate analyses.2
Travelling to another state to undergo abortion was reported by 81% of patients contacting a clinic or call center following an abortion ban. A significant increase in travel time was reported among these patients, with a mean of 11.3 hours vs 2.8 hours among preban travelers.2
Additionally, postban travelers more often traveled by bus, train, or airplane, and less often by driving. Overnight stays were also increased among this population, at 58% after bans vs 5% before bans.2
Increases in mean travel cost were reported, alongside mean pregnancy duration. Before the bans, averages were $179 and 7.7 weeks, respectively, vs $372 and 8.8 weeks, respectively, after the bans.2
Finally, the proportion of abortions occurring at 13 weeks’ gestation or later were 8% vs 17% before and after the bans, respectively. This highlighted significant impacts of statewide abortion bans on travel burdens, costs, and delays in abortion.2
“As we mark the third anniversary of the Dobbs decision this week, it continues to be clear that abortion bans cause harm,” said Foster.1
This data is support by a study presented earlier this year at the 2025 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Annual Clinical and Scientific Meeting.3 The trial assessed changes in the abortion landscape of North Carolina, highlighting delays and disparities in care.
The analysis included 49,366 abortions performed before Dobbs and 65,343 performed after. The latter cohort had a significantly increased rate of patients travelling to North Carolina from out-of-state for abortion care, at 38% vs 17% in the pre-Dobbs group.3
Investigators noted that North Carolina has become a key destination to undergo abortion among patients residing in surrounding states with harsher restrictions. This indicates the state is currently a regional access point for abortion care after the Dobbs decision.3
"Preliminary findings demonstrate a new pattern of abortion travel to North Carolina from other states in the Southeast, with significant racial and ethnic disparities," wrote the study authors.3
References
Get the latest clinical updates, case studies, and expert commentary in obstetric and gynecologic care. Sign up now to stay informed.