Adopting free EMRs without violating STARK laws

Article

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) have proposed new rules that would relax regulations that prevent physicians who care for Medicare patients from getting free electronic medical record (EMR) technology from a health-care partner. Currently, if physicians accept such a gift, they risk violating federal Stark laws and anti-kickback statutes. To avoid the appearance of an improper financial relationship, physicians can pay fair market price for information technology products. This, however, is a major barrier to adopting an interoperable electronic health-care system—especially among individual physicians and small practices, according to American Medical News (10/24-31/05).

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) have proposed new rules that would relax regulations that prevent physicians who care for Medicare patients from getting free electronic medical record (EMR) technology from a health-care partner. Currently, if physicians accept such a gift, they risk violating federal Stark laws and anti-kickback statutes. To avoid the appearance of an improper financial relationship, physicians can pay fair market price for information technology products. This, however, is a major barrier to adopting an interoperable electronic health-care system-especially among individual physicians and small practices, according to American Medical News (10/24-31/05).

Under the proposed rules, physicians would be allowed to accept certain donations of hardware, software, Internet connectivity, and training and support services for systems for e-prescribing and EMRs. But they could not accept technology or services that are equivalent to products they already own. CMS and OIG are also considering placing a monetary cap on the size of any single donation to help ensure that inappropriate financial arrangements are avoided.

The agencies are reviewing recommendations during a 60-day comment period, after which they will promulgate final rules.

Recent Videos
How sex differences impact treatment efficacy for chronic pain | Image Credit: profiles.ucalgary.ca.
Tuan Trang, PhD, discusses biological differences in chronic pain between men and women | Image Credit: profiles.ucalgary.ca.
1 expert is featured in this series.
How the Flyte device revolutionizes SUI management | Image Credit: linkedin.com.
Dr. Wanda Filer discusses how to overcome barriers to SUI treatment | Image Credit: linkedin.com.
Revi System shows efficacy against urgency urinary incontinence | Image Credit: ics.org.
1 expert is featured in this series.
Researchers highlight risks of breastfeeding while taking Levetiracetam | Image Credit: uwaterloo.ca.
Ipek Ensari, PhD, highlights improved mental health in chronic pelvic pain from physical activity | Image Credit: scholars.mssm.edu
New pSNM system empowers patients in urge urinary incontinence treatment | Image Credit: trinityhealthmichigan.org.
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.