That was the question before a Philadelphia Common Pleas Court, when a dermatologist sued two contracted doctors for taking the practice's patient list and making copies of the appointment books. The decision: Patient lists are proprietary and protected, ruled the judge.
That was the question before a Philadelphia Common Pleas Court, when a dermatologist sued two contracted doctors for taking the practice's patient list and making copies of the appointment books. The decision: Patient lists are proprietary and protected, ruled the judge.
The judge sided with the dermatologist, who charged that the information the contracted doctors took was a trade secret. The contracted physicians argued that the patient list was not a trade secret because certain names on the list did not exclusively belong to the dermatologist' practice.
In the end, the judge found the contracted doctors "liable for misappropriating the patient lists of a medical practice." Damages are expected to be decided this month.
Study finds antihypertensive treatment reduces uterine fibroids risk
April 23rd 2024A recent study revealed that patients with untreated or new-onset hypertension face elevated chances of uterine fibroid diagnosis, underscoring the potential of antihypertensive therapy in mitigating this risk among midlife individuals.
Read More
Unraveling preeclampsia: Insights into heterogeneity and intravascular inflammation
April 22nd 2024A recent study delved into the intricate clusters of term preeclampsia, shedding light on its diverse manifestations and the pivotal role of intravascular inflammation, paving the way for improved classification and management strategies.
Read More