Cesarean deliveries difficult to code into diagnostic groups

Article

The wide variation in coding practices for cesarean delivery-related hospital admissions underscores difficulties in the coding and the personal judgments that coders need to make when assessing cesareans, according to a study in the August issue of Obstetrics & Gynecology.

The wide variation in coding practices for cesarean delivery-related hospital admissions underscores difficulties in the coding and the personal judgments that coders need to make when assessing cesareans, according to a study in the August issue of Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Nancy Chescheir, MD, of the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, and Laura Meints, MD, of Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, TN, conducted a study of hospital coders from 11 institutions, who assigned nine hypothetical cesarean delivery patients to a diagnosis-related group, as well as assigning International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes and Physicians’ Current Procedural Terminology Coding System codes.

Consensus in diagnosis-related coding occurred in only two-thirds of the cases, and there was also wide variation in the ICD-9 codes used, the researchers found. Only 16.3% of the Physicians’ Current Procedural Terminology Coding System codes were used in the same case by all coders, and 28.6% of the codes were used by a single institution, the investigators discovered.

“The variability noted reflects the difficulty of the coding process and judgments that need to be made by the coders in assigning the codes,” the authors write. “Secondary uses of such codes--such as resource allocation, research, and quality surveillance--should also be used with caution, given the high degree of variation in coding practices demonstrated in both this study and other studies.”

Chescheir N, Meints L. Prospective study of coding practices for cesarean deliveries.

Obstet Gynecol.

2009;114:217-233.

Recent Videos
Expert discussions from the 2025 ACOG meeting | Image Credit: © stevengaertner - © stevengaertner - stock.adobe.com.
Trina Mansour, MD
Negative pressure wound therapy reduces c-section infections and costs | Image Credit: doctors.valleyhealth.com.
Amy Valent DO, MCR, highlights new tech for prenatal diabetes management | Image Credit: linkedin.com.
Lisa Bayer, MD, MPH
Megan Wasson, DO, FACOG
Megan Cohen, MD, MPH, outlines 2024 CDC contraception guidelines | Image Credit: linkedin.com.
Wasson and Colak
Johanna Finkle, MD, weight loss specialist, OB/GYN, The University of Kansas Health System.
Navigating hormone therapy in high-risk menopause cases | Image Credit: © dhaj7-cepo.com.
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.