Diabetes, folic acid intake affect fetal risk of birth defects

Article

Not taking vitamins or supplements containing folic acid around the time of conception may double the risk of heart and noncardiac birth defects in children of women with diabetes mellitus.

The risk of birth defects for children of diabetic mothers is influenced by both the mother’s diabetes and her intake of folic acid around the time of conception.

Clinicians should encourage all patients contemplating pregnancy to initiate prophylactic folic acid supplementation.

Not taking vitamins or supplements containing folic acid around the time of conception may double the risk of heart and noncardiac birth defects among the offspring of women with diabetes mellitus, according to the findings of a multicenter, population-based case-control study.

Researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, which included approximately 20,000 affected and control infants. Children with birth defects were stratified into 18 groups with various heart defects and 26 groups with noncardiac birth defects.

The results reveal a pattern of odds ratios suggestive of at least a nonstatistically significant 2-fold greater risk of birth defects among the offspring of diabetic women who didn’t take folic acid-containing vitamins periconceptionally versus those who did. The pattern held true for approximately 75% of the birth defects studied. In addition, they found an association between preexisting diabetes mellitus and an increased risk of birth defects, regardless of periconceptional use of supplements containing folic acid.

But the authors were quick to note that the diabetic women who used supplements likely planned their pregnancies and so were more likely to maintain better glycemic control periconceptionally than diabetic women who did not use supplements. Good glycemic control can reduce the increased risk for birth defects to rates similar to those of nondiabetic women.

It is difficult to know whether any apparent synergistic relationship between diabetes and the lack of folic acid supplementation reflects differences in pregnancy planning and glycemic control or is a pure effect from the lack of a folic acid-containing supplement. 

The authors conclude that because the risk of birth defects among diabetic women remains high, any prevention is welcome. Thus, all women of reproductive age should be encouraged to consume vitamin supplements containing folic acid.

The study was published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2012;206[3]:218.e1-218.e13).

Read other articles in this issue of Special Delivery

Related Videos
The significance of the Supreme Court upholding mifepristone access | Image Credit: unchealth.org
One year out: Fezolinetant displays patient satisfaction for managing hot flashes | Image Credit: sutterhealth.org
Addressing maternal health inequities: Insights from CDC's Wanda Barfield | Image Credit: cdc.gov
Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in brachial plexus birth Injury | Image Credit: shrinerschildrens.org
Innovations in prenatal care: Insights from ACOG 2024 | Image Credit:  uofmhealth.org.
Unlocking therapeutic strategies for menopausal cognitive decline | Image Credit: uclahealth.org.
Navigating menopause care: Expert insights from ACOG 2024 | Image Credit: mayo.edu.
raanan meyer, md
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.