Key takeaways:
- First-trimester anatomy screening enables significantly earlier detection of major fetal anomalies compared with standard second-trimester scans.
- Survey data from 110 maternity trusts revealed substantial variation in early ultrasound practices across England.
- Trusts using more advanced first-trimester protocols reported higher early detection rates, with Group D reaching 40.4%.
- Researchers linked screening practices to national anomaly registry data, covering more than 1 million pregnancies.
- Investigators emphasize the need for updated national guidance to standardize early screening and support timely clinical decision-making for families.
Serious structural issues in fetuses can be identified sooner by first-trimester screening, according to a recent study published in PLOS Medicine on November 25, 2025.1
Congenital anomalies are often detected during a second-trimester ultrasound at 20-weeks’ gestation, but advances in imaging have allowed for earlier screening. However, earlier evaluations are currently not recommended by policy in England.1
“With advancing ultrasound technology much earlier detection of serious fetal conditions is now feasible; our guidance must catch up to these developments so families can benefit,” said Jehan Karim, MBBS, MSc, lead researcher and junior research fellow at the University of Oxford.1
Survey distribution and trust classification
The study was conducted to determine whether first-trimester fetal anatomy screening impacts the timing of major fetal anomaly diagnoses.2 In the first part of the study, a nationwide survey of first-trimester ultrasound practices was distributed to maternity units in England.2
Domains of the survey included current first-trimester ultrasound protocols, local policies, inclusion of an early assessment of fetal anatomy, and availability of resources. The reliability and validity of the survey was confirmed through a multi-stage validation and piloting process.2
Finalized surveys were provided to maternity units electronically on January 25, 2019, with reminders sent out in February 2019. Trusts were classified into 4 groups based on their survey responses:2
- Group A with no formal first-trimester fetal anatomy assessment through ultrasound
- Group B with a basic anatomical assessment
- Group C with an advanced anatomical protocol
- Group D with an extended anatomical protocol
Linking survey data to anomaly registries
Survey data was linked to information about the number of babies diagnosed with a congenital anatomy and diagnosis timing through the National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Disease Registration Service (NCARDRS) database. Anomalies were coded in the NCARDRS database based on the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision.2
Anomalies of interest included 12 structural anomalies that are monitored in the second-trimester Fetal Anomaly Screening Program, alongside 2 anomalies considered important in the early anatomy scan. Categories of gestational age at diagnosis included before 16-weeks’ gestation, 16- to 23-weeks’, and after 24-weeks’ but before birth.2