Failure to timely perform repeat c/section

Article

A Minnesota woman was pregnant with her third child in 2003. She had a history of two previous cesarean sections. One week before her scheduled repeat C/S she was admitted to the hospital with painful contractions. The cervix was only 1 cm dilated and it was decided to monitor her for further cervical dilation and perform a repeat C/S if the cervix dilated. She was monitored intermittently by external fetal monitoring while she continued to have contractions. The patient complained of pain at a "101" level despite pain medication and requested a C/S. The fetal heart rate became suspicious and an emergency C/S was performed. The infant was found floating freely in the abdominal cavity due to a ruptured uterus. The infant exhibited hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and suffered brain injury and will require assistance in all activities of daily living.

A Minnesota woman was pregnant with her third child in 2003. She had a history of two previous cesarean sections. One week before her scheduled repeat C/S she was admitted to the hospital with painful contractions. The cervix was only 1 cm dilated and it was decided to monitor her for further cervical dilation and perform a repeat C/S if the cervix dilated. She was monitored intermittently by external fetal monitoring while she continued to have contractions. The patient complained of pain at a "101" level despite pain medication and requested a C/S. The fetal heart rate became suspicious and an emergency C/S was performed. The infant was found floating freely in the abdominal cavity due to a ruptured uterus. The infant exhibited hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and suffered brain injury and will require assistance in all activities of daily living.

In the lawsuit that followed the patient claimed that the C/S should have been performed earlier and that her reports of pain were sufficient to require further investigation.

The physicians claimed that it was proper to wait for cervical dilation before proceeding to C/S. The parties disputed the child's expected life span, but a settlement was reached for $5 million, a portion of which was used to purchase an annuity and another portion was placed in a supplemental needs trust.

Recent Videos
Supreme Court upholds mifepristone access: Implications for women's health | Image Credit: linkedin.com
The significance of the Supreme Court upholding mifepristone access | Image Credit: unchealth.org
One year out: Fezolinetant displays patient satisfaction for managing hot flashes | Image Credit: sutterhealth.org
Addressing maternal health inequities: Insights from CDC's Wanda Barfield | Image Credit: cdc.gov
Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in brachial plexus birth Injury | Image Credit: shrinerschildrens.org
Innovations in prenatal care: Insights from ACOG 2024 | Image Credit:  uofmhealth.org.
Unlocking therapeutic strategies for menopausal cognitive decline | Image Credit: uclahealth.org.
Navigating menopause care: Expert insights from ACOG 2024 | Image Credit: mayo.edu.
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.