
- Vol 64 No 05
- Volume 64
- Issue 05
FDA proposes updates to mammography regulations
The proposed changes address mammographic technology, enhancing quality standards, and improving the way results of screening are handled throughout the healthcare system.
The public comment period is open for a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Included in the description of the new rule are projections of the financial impact of the changes. They relate to new breast density reporting requirements that FDA believes could result in fewer deaths and lower costs for breast cancer treatment. Annualized benefits over 10 years, according to the agency, range from a low of $16.27 million to a high of $534.03 million. Annualized costs to mammography facilities over 10 years are estimated to range from $34.96 million to $59.40 million.
If passed, the rule would require, among other things, that:
- Mammographic reports to patients and healthcare providers include an assessment of breast density and the potential limitations of the results to promote informed healthcare decision-making;
- Mammographic facilities implement policies and procedures to minimize loss of images and that they transfer original mammograms and copies of reports to patients, healthcare providers and others within specific timeframes;
- Changes be made to explanatory language for “benign” findings and that three new categories of mammographic assessment be added to existing language to help mammographic facilities more precisely classify and communicate results of exams; and
- If a facility is closing or will no longer perform mammography, it makes arrangements to give patients and healthcare providers access to mammographic images and reports.
In a
The public has until June 26, 2019 to comment on the proposed rule, which would be the first amendment to the Mammography Quality Standards Act in more than 20 years. The provisions would be effective 18 months after date of publication of the final rule in the Federal Register.
Articles in this issue
over 6 years ago
Why I chose a MIGS fellowshipover 6 years ago
Reproductive risks of advanced paternal ageover 6 years ago
Counseling on complex contraception dilemmas: Case 2over 6 years ago
Congenital syphilis makes a comebackover 6 years ago
Redefining postpartum careover 6 years ago
Was this rectocele repair necessary?over 6 years ago
Drug for postmenopausal osteoporosis gets nod from FDAover 6 years ago
Experimental vaccine for HPV-associated CIN2/3over 6 years ago
Should ob/gyns use metformin to treat pregnant women with PCOS?Newsletter
Get the latest clinical updates, case studies, and expert commentary in obstetric and gynecologic care. Sign up now to stay informed.




















