Xu contextualized the magnitude of that shift. "This translates to roughly 20,000 pregnant people exposed to GLP-1 medication in 2024 alone," he said. "And we're already in 2026 now—so this data ended in 2024, so if I had to guess, we might be at an even larger number at this point."
The clinical backdrop driving the study reflects a common scenario on labor and delivery. "Patients come to us and say, 'I've been on this for the last year, I didn't plan on getting pregnant, but here I am—what are the risks?'" said Jeannie C. Kelly, MD, MS, division chief, Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Ultrasound Division, vice chair of Obstetrics, and an associate professor of obstetrics/gynecology at Washington University in St. Louis. "Right now, we have some answers to those questions, but a lot more work needs to be done."
Kelly noted that unplanned pregnancies make inadvertent GLP-1 RA exposure nearly inevitable at current prescribing volumes. "Many pregnancies happen without intending for a pregnancy to happen, and a lot of times there's inadvertent or unplanned medication exposure in those pregnancies," she said. "This is definitely one of those medications that we're seeing quite frequently now."
Although the study did not assess fetal or maternal outcomes, the rapid adoption of these agents—across insured and uninsured populations alike—establishes the scale of exposure that outcome studies will need to address.
"This work really is the start of that," Kelly said, "which is to just look at the prescribing trends around the time of pregnancy for us to understand how big this exposure is happening."
Reference:
1. Lessard C, Cary C, In A, et al. Prescribing Trends in glucagon-like peptide-1 medications among pregnant and postpartum persons. Obstet Gynecol. 2026;147(3):290-292. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000006161