Not offering genetic testing for a 42-year-old woman results in Down syndrome.
A 42-year-old New Jersey woman underwent an ultrasound during her pregnancy and the radiologist who interpreted the U/S reported it as normal. After delivery, the infant was diagnosed with Down syndrome. The woman then sued the obstetrician and radiologist, alleging wrongful birth. She argued the obstetrician failed to order a targeted U/S that was warranted due to maternal age. She claimed this would have focused on the fetal anatomical markers known to be associated with Down syndrome and resulted in an amniocentesis and prenatal diagnosis. She also alleged she should have been referred to a genetic counselor to discuss the risks of genetic abnormality and the risks of amniocentesis. She claimed negligence by the radiologist and his practice for failing to identify a thickened nuchal fold on U/S. An $8.23 million verdict was returned, with the obstetrician being assessed 85% liability and the radiology defendants 15% of the liability.
Department editor DAWN COLLINS, JD, is an attorney specializing in medical malpractice in Long Beach, CA. She welcomes feedback on this column via e-mail to dawncfree@gmail.com
.
Balancing VTE and bleeding risks in gynecologic cancer surgeries
December 6th 2024A comprehensive analysis shows the benefits of thromboprophylaxis often outweigh the bleeding risks during gynecologic cancer procedures, though patient-specific risk factors are crucial for decision-making.
Read More
Expert consensus sheds light on diagnosis and management of vasa previa
December 5th 2024A recent review established guidelines for prenatal diagnosis and care of vasa previa, outlining its definition, screening and diagnosis, management, and timing of delivery in asymptomatic patients.
Read More