A woman was admitted to the hospital with a twin pregnancy and spontaneous rupture of membranes.
An Indiana woman was admitted to the hospital with a twin pregnancy at 35.5 weeks' gestation with spontaneous rupture of membranes. She was seen by the attending obstetrician, who determined that both fetuses were breech and that one had ruptured membranes. She was therefore placed on fetal monitors. The following morning, another obstetrician took over her care, became concerned about a prolapsed cord, and decided to do a cesarean section. This was performed 2.5 hours later. The first twin was delivered successfully, but the second twin with the ruptured membranes was stillborn.
The woman sued both obstetricians involved and the hospital, claiming that she should have had an immediate C/S upon hospital admission and that when the order was given to perform a C/S, the physician should have made sure it was done in a more timely manner. She alleged that the FHRs could not be monitored properly due to her large size and thus delivery was indicated much earlier.
The claims against the hospital and delivering physician were dismissed on summary judgment and the case proceeded against the admitting obstetrician. He argued that an immediate C/S was not required and that the FHRs were being monitored. The jury returned a defense verdict.
Get the latest clinical updates, case studies, and expert commentary in obstetric and gynecologic care. Sign up now to stay informed.
Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole not found to increase infant birth weight in HIV cases
July 9th 2025A recent randomized trial found no significant improvement in birth weight or key birth outcomes from antenatal trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis in human immunodeficiency virus-positive pregnant women.
Read More