Letters to the Editor: 17OHP benefits prior preterm birth patients


The author of the letter addresses the contradiction of Dr. Charles Lockwood's recommendation of 17OHP to treat prior preterm birth patients.

Dr Charles Lockwood, one of the foremost authorities on preterm birth, has written a balanced and factual editorial laying out his view of progestin use today and in the future.1 However, although his editorial speculates that vaginal progesterone might eventually replace hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17OHP) for reducing the risk of preterm birth, he still recommends 17OHP to treat prior preterm birth patients. Why this apparent contradiction?

The most obvious reason to recommend 17OHP is that current evidence demonstrates that vaginal progesterone is ineffective for patients with a prior preterm birth, but shows benefit for short cervix patients. The da Fonseca study using vaginal suppositories was only positive when an analysis excluding many patients was performed2 and a second, larger study using vaginal gel was negative.3 The 2 prospective studies in which vaginal progesterone showed benefit enrolled women with a short cervix, which represents only about 2% of pregnant women.4,5

Recent literature has documented the risks of serious neonatal morbidity in late preterm births. Hydroxyprogesterone caproate in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) study6 is the only progestin shown to reduce the number of preterm births (defined as less than 37 weeks). Vaginal progesterone shifted early preterm births to late preterm births. Both the da Fonseca and O'Brien prior preterm birth studies showed no difference at less than 37 weeks when analyzed using the intent-to-treat principle.2,3 The short cervix studies either did not report data after 34 weeks4 or showed no difference at less than 37 weeks.5 Further, a subanalysis of short-cervix patients in the DeFranco study showed no difference at less than 37 weeks.7 Therefore, no evidence currently exists that vaginal progesterone has any impact on late preterm birth, which represents the majority of preterm births. Only the NICHD study of 17OHP demonstrates benefit for prior preterm birth patients at early and late gestational ages.6


Related Videos
Understanding combined oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk | Image Credit: health.ucdavis.edu
Why doxycycline PEP lacks clinical data for STI prevention in women
The importance of nipocalimab’s FTD against FNAIT | Image Credit:  linkedin.com
Enhancing cervical cancer management with dual stain | Image Credit: linkedin.com
Fertility treatment challenges for Muslim women during fasting holidays | Image Credit: rmanetwork.com
Understanding the impact of STIs on young adults | Image Credit: providers.ucsd.edu.
CDC estimates of maternal mortality found overestimated | Image Credit: rwjms.rutgers.edu.
Study unveils maternal mortality tracking trends | Image Credit: obhg.com
How Harmonia Healthcare is revolutionizing hyperemesis gravidarum care | Image Credit: hyperemesis.org
Unveiling gender disparities in medicine | Image Credit:  findcare.ahn.org.
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.