Misoprostol for induction of labor at term?

Article

While oral misoprostol isn't superior to vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor at term, it isn't inferior either. It doesn't lead to poorer health outcomes for women or their infants and offers a preferred route of administration.

While oral misoprostol isn't superior to vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor at term, it isn't inferior either. It doesn't lead to poorer health outcomes for women or their infants and offers a preferred route of administration.

Researchers from Australia conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 741 women. They found no significant differences in the rates of vaginal birth not achieved in 24 hours (46% vs. 41.2%), cesarean section (22.7% vs. 26.6%), cesarean section for fetal distress (8.8% vs. 9.3%), or in uterine hyperstimulation with changes in fetal heart rate (0.8% vs. 1.6%). In addition, the women randomized to receive misoprostol reported a more positive birth experience.

Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Robinson JS. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour at term: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2006;332:509-513.

Newsletter

Get the latest clinical updates, case studies, and expert commentary in obstetric and gynecologic care. Sign up now to stay informed.

Recent Videos
Ousseny Zerbo, PhD, highlights benefits of influenza vaccination during pregnancy | Image Credit: divisionofresearch.kaiserpermanente.org.
Michael Ussher, PhD, highlights the benefits of vaping over smoking in pregnancy | Image Credit: sgul.ac.uk.
Neal Barnard, MD, FACC, highlights AMA's new breast cancer prevention guidelines | Image Credit: pcrm.org.
Zachary Wagner, PhD, discusses the harms of bias in reproductive care | Image Credit: ornsife.usc.edu.
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.