Lawsuits were filed in NJ against Aetna and Cigna, alleging flawed database to intentionally shortchange out-of-network physicians.
The American Medical Association and state medical societies filed class-action lawsuits in New Jersey against Aetna and Cigna, alleging that the carriers use a flawed database to intentionally shortchange out-of-network physicians, which violates federal racketeering and antitrust laws, as well as federal health insurance laws. A report in American Medical News (2/23/09) notes that the database in question was created by Ingenix, a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group, which recently settled a similar case in New York state.
United agreed to contribute money toward a new, independent database, as have Aetna and Cigna. But unlike United, Aetna and Cigna have not agreed to reimburse doctors for underpayments related to the old database. If the suits against Aetna and Cigna are resolved in physicians' favor, doctors who were paid for out-of-network care could be compensated for alleged shortfalls. Cigna and Aetna maintain that their payments were fair and have vowed to fight the legal actions.
Balancing VTE and bleeding risks in gynecologic cancer surgeries
December 6th 2024A comprehensive analysis shows the benefits of thromboprophylaxis often outweigh the bleeding risks during gynecologic cancer procedures, though patient-specific risk factors are crucial for decision-making.
Read More
Expert consensus sheds light on diagnosis and management of vasa previa
December 5th 2024A recent review established guidelines for prenatal diagnosis and care of vasa previa, outlining its definition, screening and diagnosis, management, and timing of delivery in asymptomatic patients.
Read More