Opioid abuse in pregnant women on rise

Article

Prevalence of opioid abuse during pregnancy has more than doubled over the past 14 years, according to a new study in Anesthesiology.

 

Prevalence of opioid abuse during pregnancy has more than doubled over the past 14 years, according to a new study in Anesthesiology.  Narcotic dependence, the researchers found, was associated with a 4.6-fold increased risk of maternal death during hospitalization.

Presented at the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Annual Meeting, the findings were based on data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, which included nearly 57 million women admitted to U.S. hospitals for delivery between 1998 and 2011. Researchers examined associations between maternal opioid abuse or dependence and obstetrical outcomes, using logistic regression and adjusting for confounders.

During the study period, the prevalence of opioid abuse or dependence increased from 0.17% to 0.39%, an increase of 127%. When compared with deliveries with no maternal opioid abuse or dependence, deliveries to mothers with opioid abuse or dependence were associated with increased odds of maternal death during hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 12.1, crude incidence 0.03 vs 0.006%), cardiac arrest (aOR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 9.1; 0.04 vs 0.01%), placental abruption (aOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.1 to 2.6; 3.8 vs 1.1%), length of stay more than 7 days (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 2.0 to 2.5; 3.0 vs 1.2%), oligohydramnios (aOR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.6 to 1.9; 4.5 vs 2.8%), and transfusion (aOR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.5 to 1.9; 2.0 vs 1.0%).  

Additional outcomes negatively impacted by narcotic dependence included stillbirth (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3 to 1.8; 1.2 vs 0.6%), intrauterine growth restriction (aOR, 2.7; 95% CI, 2.4 to 2.9; 6.8 vs 2.1%), premature rupture of membranes (aOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3 to 1.6; 5.7 vs 3.8%), preterm labor (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 2.0 to 2.3; 17.3 vs 7.4%), and cesarean delivery (aOR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.3; 36.3 vs 33.1%).

Point/Counterpoint: Is HPV testing ready for 'prime' time in cervical cancer detection?

Despite the large sample size, the researchers were unable to confirm the diagnoses and comorbidities with a chart review because patient data were deidentified. Information on other covariates such as maternal weight, body mass index, and gestational age also were unavailable. It also was not possible to differentiate between women who abused or were dependent on opioid drugs; women who were enrolled in opioid maintenance programs; or those who abused heroin.

To get weekly advice for today's Ob/Gyn, subscribe to the Contemporary OB/GYN Special Delivery.

Recent Videos
Eran Bornstein, MD, highlights early signs of preeclampsia clinicians need to know | Image Credit: northwell.edu.
Eran Bornstein, MD explains the need for first trimester preeclampsia screening | Image Credit: northwell.edu.
Veerle Bergink, MD, PhD, highlights familial links of postpartum psychosis | Image Credit: profiles.mountsinai.org.
Ivie Odiase, MD
Amy Valent DO, MCR, highlights new tech for prenatal diabetes management | Image Credit: linkedin.com.
Johanna Finkle, MD, weight loss specialist, OB/GYN, The University of Kansas Health System.
Laxmi Gannu, MD, notes PPD screening gaps and adverse outcomes | Image Credit: linkedin.com.
Farah Amro, MD
Laurence Shields, MD, is System Physician Vice President at the Women and Infants Clinical Institute with CommonSpirit Health in Santa Maria, California.
Joy Baker, MD, FACOG, highlights how to recognize PPD | Image Credit: linkedin.com.
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.