Key takeaways:
- Following the Dobbs v. Jackson decision, permanent contraception procedures increased by 51% across 4 academic medical centers.
- The Dobbs ruling influenced the timing of women’s decisions for tubal ligation more than the decision itself.
- Post-Dobbs patients were more likely to be younger and nulliparous, with 37% aged under 30 years and 21.2% having no prior births.
- Nearly half of surveyed women said the current political climate affected their reproductive decision-making.
- E-visits for contraception showed promise in expanding access and reducing disparities, especially among minority populations.
Researchers from Penn State and other locations have identified increased proportions of women seeking permanent contraception following the US Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision ending the federal constitutional right to abortion in June 2022, publishing their findings in Contraception.1
These increases included a 51% rise in tubal ligation procedures among women attending 1 of 4 academic medical centers. Access to reproductive health options was commonly cited as a reason for seeking permanent contraception, with 47% of patients in New York and Pennsylvania having their decision influenced by the current political climate.1
“The Dobbs decision was an inflection point that made people think about their future plans,” said Sarah Horvath, MD, MSHP, study co-author and associate professor at Penn State. “More than anything, we saw that the Dobbs decision impacted the timing for people seeking tubal ligations more than it influenced the actual decision to have the procedure.”1
Increase in procedure rates
The multicenter retrospective study was conducted to assess the change in female permanent contraception procedure rates following the Dobbs decision and determine the influence of political factors on these shifts.2 Procedures were assessed at 4 academic medical centers in New York, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Tennessee.
July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022, was defined as the pre-Dobbs period, while July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, was defined as the post-Dobbs period. The change in procedure volume was reported as the primary outcome, while differences in patient characteristics and decision-making were reported as secondary outcomes.2
The final analysis included 445 procedures in the pre-Dobbs period and 674 in the post-Dobbs period. Among these patients, an increase in average monthly procedure volume was reported, with means of 9.3 and 14, respectively. Individual institution increases ranged from 28% to 129%.2
Traits linked to contraception post-Dobbs
Being aged under 30 years and nulliparous was more common in post-Dobbs patients, with rates including: