When it comes to pay-for-performance programs, recognition of a physician's accomplishments, along with financial rewards, may be the combination needed to produce results.
When it comes to pay-for-performance programs, recognition of a physician's accomplishments, along with financial rewards, may be the combination needed to produce results. In more than half of the seven projects of Rewarding Results-a 3-year, $8.8 million study featuring several pay-for-performance models-the public or private reporting of how frequently physicians met certain quality measures played an important role in improving quality.
Of course, the financial incentive cannot be discounted as a key component. To make a difference, monetary rewards need to be large enough to motivate physicians to effect change. At a minimum, the incentive may need to be set at $5,000 per physician or at least 10% of a doctor's annual income.
While the study does not provide definitive answers for the most appropriate pay-for-performance program, it is a good first step. Suzanne Delbanco, CEO of the Leapfrog Group, an employer coalition devoted to improving health-care quality, told Modern Healthcare (11/21/05), "... what's exciting is that it's really the first tangible evidence we have that pay-for-performance does move health care in the right direction."
Get the latest clinical updates, case studies, and expert commentary in obstetric and gynecologic care. Sign up now to stay informed.
Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole not found to increase infant birth weight in HIV cases
July 9th 2025A recent randomized trial found no significant improvement in birth weight or key birth outcomes from antenatal trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis in human immunodeficiency virus-positive pregnant women.
Read More