PODCAST: Sexual coercion: Moving beyond screening


Elizabeth Miller, MD, PhD, discusses her article in the February issue of Contemporary OB/GYN on sexual coercion.

Dr. Miller: I’m Elizabeth Miller and I’m the Division Chief of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine at Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC.

Susan Olmstead: So Dr. Miller we’re just going to talk a little bit about your article that appeared in our February issue on reproductive and sexual coercion, specifically about some of the counseling strategies you wrote about. First, let me ask, do you ask questions relating to intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion to all your patients or do you only initiate this conversation with patients who you suspect might have been victimized?

Dr. Miller: So I talk about partner violence and sexual violence with all of my patients really using a universal education and routine inquiry approach. So it’s less about asking the right leading question as much as I say I talk to all of my patients about this with every visit.

Susan Olmstead: I see, so it’s more of a discussion rather than specific questions?

Dr. Miller: Exactly. Now if I have a patient who, as we talk about in the article where maybe they’ve come in several times requesting emergency contraception or they come in multiple times for sexually transmitted infections, those are certainly red flags that tell me there might be something more going on. And in those instances I will say to patients, for example, “When I see a pattern of infections like this it makes me wonder and worry about people making you do things sexual that you didn’t want to do.” And I just kind of put that out there to see, you know, what the response might be. And I had a young woman in the clinic not too long ago when I used that as my opening and she looked at me and said “how did you know?” So you never know how these kind of openings to the conversation are going to go but as we point out in the article, the goal of having this conversation in the health care setting is not about identification, and much more about communicating to our patients that number one they deserve to be treated with respect and number two, that we’re here in a non-judgmental and safe place in the clinical setting to be able to talk about these issues and to connect our patients to relevant services, resources, and supports. And I think that’s a really big shift from just focusing on screening questions and waiting for a patient to check yes on a check box.

Recommended: Tips for treating recurrent vulvovaginitis

Susan Olmstead: Right. Now do you think of yourself as unusual in using this approach or do you know of colleagues who use this approach as well?

Dr. Miller: So an increasing number of colleagues have shifted to this more universal education and brief counseling approach. And I think it’s for two reasons; one, is that what we have found that to rely solely on screening questions and waiting for women to check yes or to say yes, that our disclosure rates are extremely low, maybe 1 to 2%. In places where they ask more routinely about this, it may be a little bit better, maybe 10%, but that means that we see a large number of our patients who could benefit from the messages that they deserve to be treated with respect and here’s this list of resources that are available to you. Such that by shifting to a universal education approach you are much more likely to have impact for our patients. When I am interviewing women who are survivors of intimate partner violence about what they want, one of the most important requests they have of health care providers is please don’t push me to disclose to you but let me know that you care and let me know that you can connect me to help when I’m ready. Now when we really shift what our goal is in healthcare to that sensibility of “I’m here for you whenever you’re ready to talk about these issues, and if it’s not you, maybe you’ve got a friend or a loved one who you want to bring in to clinic to talk about these issues.” And that really changed the tone for us in terms of what we get to do as healthcare providers. It’s not like I’m pulling this out of a hat, it’s really based on research that I conducted and my co-author Dr. Chang has conducted showing that when we have these conversations with our patients they’re significantly more likely to use interventions, whether to call a hotline or speak with an advocate or reach out to a counselor. And that’s huge.

NEXT: Dr. Miller shares some of experiences with patients.


Susan Olmstead: It is, it is. And do you find that using normalizing language helps to draw people out as well?

Dr. Miller: Absolutely because we all recognize that there’s a stigma associated with domestic violence and with sexual violence. You know calling something rape is very difficult, in particular, when sexual violence is occurring in the context of a relationship. And so because of that the normalizing is absolutely critical. One of the things that I will say is there are many young people in our practices who are in unhealthy and sometimes dangerous relationships which is why we’re talking to everybody about this. If there’s some information that you can take along maybe you don’t need it but if there’s a friend or somebody you care about who could use this information please share it with them. And so what that does is really make sure that, it allows them to take the information because then you’re taking it not for themselves but for a friend, giving them an excuse to take the information. But it also ensures that you’re communicating that you don’t have to disclose to me, I just know that this goes on for a lot of my patients. It’s a much more trauma informed approach. Now this concept of trauma informed, I think a number of physicians are aware that many of our patients who come to see us have been exposed to various forms of interpersonal violence and that it impacts their care seeking, it impacts the kinds of problems that they come in with. And this trauma informed approached basically is saying we recognize that many of our patients have experienced trauma and we’re here to be respectful, to be non-judgmental, to be gentle in the way in which we approach you and that we have the ability to connect you to services and supports as necessary. And that shift for us away from screening and disclosure to this much more, I think a warmer and more inclusive focus on making the clinical setting a safe place for our patients who’ve experienced partner violence is huge.

Susan Olmstead: I see. So in your experience, reproductive coercion is rather common or at least interpersonal violence. As far as reproductive coercion itself, have you found that it usually takes the form of pressuring women to continue pregnancies or to end them? I thought that was very interesting.

Read more: Case hinges on off-label tocolytic use

Dr. Miller: So reproductive coercion is not only about controlling the outcomes of a pregnancy, but also pressure to get pregnant in the first place. This involves abusive male partners pressuring a woman to get pregnant when she doesn’t want to be, preventing her from using birth control, And this concept of reproductive coercion first came to my attention back when I was interviewing young women about their experiences in abusive relationships and how it has impacted their health and the very first interview I did with a young woman, she said well you know he flushed my birth control pills down the toilet. And I said he did what? Yeah, he told my friends we were starting a family. I wasn’t ready to start a family, I wanted to finish school. And as I continued with these interviews about a quarter of the young women we interviewed had experienced this kind of active sabotaging of their birth control, explicit attempts to get them pregnant when they didn’t want to be. And then one patient, I had one young woman who said he got me pregnant on purpose and then he made me get an abortion.

Susan Olmstead: Oh my goodness.

Dr. Miller: So yes, a stark reminder that this is another example of enacting power and control in that relationship, the male partner trying to have ultimate control over your body. And others where the conflict has been around wanting her to continue a pregnancy she doesn’t want to continue. Or forcing her to terminate a pregnancy she wants to continue. And so we recognize that pregnancies can be highly contested, it can be very conflicted. I totally agree that reproductive coercion is part of intimate partner violence, this whole constellation of ways in which abusive partners can enact power and control in a relationship. The reason that I have really highlighted reproductive coercion for us as clinicians is that it’s something that we can ask about directly which we have not done in the past. If we simply ask ‘Have you been hit, kicked, slapped, pushed, choked or forced to have sex against your will?,’ we are going to miss reproductive coercion. And certainly in the OB/GYN setting we’re able to offer longer acting reversible contraceptives. We’re able to offer ways to reduce her risk for a pregnancy that she doesn’t want. And a clear example of that is a copper IUD. I had one patient who we were trying to figure out what form of contraception she could use and I suggested the Depo-Provera injections. She said you know that’s not going to work because he monitors my period. And I said okay, well in which case then you may have to think about the copper IUD. She said I’m really worried about whether he’s going to feel it or not, would you consider cutting the strings.

Susan Olmstead: So a patient came to you first with that?

Dr. Miller: Exactly. And it was really amazing to me that there is a survivor helping me think about what I, as a clinician, could do to reduce the risk for a pregnancy that she was not ready for. She already had two babies with this partner. It was a verbally and emotionally abusive relationship. What was so powerful was being able to offer her what I call a harm reduction strategy, reducing her risk for an unintended pregnancy, connecting her to a domestic violence advocate so she could learn more and then several years into our primary care relationship she came in one evening and said you know Dr. Miller he threw a chair at me this evening and it’s the first time he’s tried to hurt me physically and you’ve been talking to me about this for all these years and I knew you could help. And it was really, it was so powerful to know that she knew that the clinical space was where she could come to get connected to help. 

Related Videos
Understanding combined oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk | Image Credit: health.ucdavis.edu
Matthew Zerden, MD
Marci Bowers, MD | Image Credit: Marcibowers.com
Angela Dempsey
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.