Primary HPV Testing vs Co-testing for Cervical Cancer Screening

Article

This article provides foundational evidence demonstrating the diagnostic superiority of co-testing compared with primary high-risk HPV testing alone (HPV testing).

 

Outcome and Economics Support that Co-testing is Superior



In 2014, the FDA approved a DNA HPV test for primary cervical cancer screening in women 25 years and older. This article provides foundational evidence demonstrating the diagnostic superiority of co-testing compared with primary high-risk HPV testing alone (HPV testing). Using an extensive modeling analysis, a screening span of up to 40 years, and a constructed cohort of 1 million women, we predicted that co-testing would result in thousands of fewer invasive cervical cancer cases and deaths and would save the healthcare system $39 million over the 40 years, as compared to a strategy using primary HPV testing alone. These findings are not only relevant when considering Women’s Healthcare policies, but they also direct attention to real-world outcomes and economics critical to selecting the best strategies for cervical cancer screening.

 

 

Recent Videos
Supreme Court upholds mifepristone access: Implications for women's health | Image Credit: linkedin.com
The significance of the Supreme Court upholding mifepristone access | Image Credit: unchealth.org
One year out: Fezolinetant displays patient satisfaction for managing hot flashes | Image Credit: sutterhealth.org
Addressing maternal health inequities: Insights from CDC's Wanda Barfield | Image Credit: cdc.gov
Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in brachial plexus birth Injury | Image Credit: shrinerschildrens.org
Innovations in prenatal care: Insights from ACOG 2024 | Image Credit:  uofmhealth.org.
Unlocking therapeutic strategies for menopausal cognitive decline | Image Credit: uclahealth.org.
Navigating menopause care: Expert insights from ACOG 2024 | Image Credit: mayo.edu.
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.