Quality of health care improved by pay-for-performance?

Article

Among 17 studies recently reviewed, five out of six studies of physician-level financial incentives and seven out of nine studies of group-level incentives showed a partial or positive effect on the quality of care.

Among 17 studies recently reviewed, five out of six studies of physician-level financial incentives and seven out of nine studies of group-level incentives showed a partial or positive effect on the quality of care. One of two studies of payment-system level incentives had a positive effect on access to care, while the other had a negative effect. In total, four of the 17 showed unintended consequences from incentives.

Based on these findings, the researchers, whose work was published in the Annals of Internal Medicine (8/15/2006), found that few generalizations could be made. However, they did note that programs using financial incentives often do produce a response, although the response may be an unintended one. The researchers offered a few tips when designing such programs to achieve an intended goal:

Recent Videos
Supreme Court upholds mifepristone access: Implications for women's health | Image Credit: linkedin.com
The significance of the Supreme Court upholding mifepristone access | Image Credit: unchealth.org
One year out: Fezolinetant displays patient satisfaction for managing hot flashes | Image Credit: sutterhealth.org
Addressing maternal health inequities: Insights from CDC's Wanda Barfield | Image Credit: cdc.gov
Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in brachial plexus birth Injury | Image Credit: shrinerschildrens.org
Innovations in prenatal care: Insights from ACOG 2024 | Image Credit:  uofmhealth.org.
Unlocking therapeutic strategies for menopausal cognitive decline | Image Credit: uclahealth.org.
Navigating menopause care: Expert insights from ACOG 2024 | Image Credit: mayo.edu.
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.