Rapid yeast assay cheaper than culture, more sensitive than wet mount



In the diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis, a rapid yeast detection assay is an accurate and economical alternative to the standard yeast culture and is more sensitive than the wet mount, according to a report published in the April issue of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Ashwin J. Chatwani, MD, of Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia, and colleagues obtained vaginal swabs from 104 women (34 of them asymptomatic women and 70 of them symptomatic with vaginitis) and performed yeast culture, wet mount, and rapid yeast detection tests.

Overall, the researchers found that the rapid yeast test had higher rates of sensitivity and negative predictive value (73.1% and 82%, respectively) than the wet mount (43.9% and 70.9%, respectively). They also found that the rapid yeast test had a higher sensitivity in symptomatic patients (77.4% vs. 51.6% for wet mount).

Chatwani AJ, Mehta R, Hassan S, et al. Rapid testing for vaginal yeast detection: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:309.e1-e4.

Related Videos
Exploring the intersection of heart health and women's health | Image Credit: cedars-sinai.org
Unlocking the benefits of DHEA | Image Credit: drannacabeca.com
Unlocking the power of oxytocin | Image credit: drannacabeca.com
Revolutionizing menopause management: A deep dive into fezolinetant | Image Credit: uvahealth.com.
Deciding the best treatment for uterine fibroids | Image Credit: jeffersonhealth.org.
Clinical pearls of pediatric dermatology | Image Credit: profiles.ucsf.edu
Approaching inflammatory vulvovaginal diseases | Image Credit: profiles.ucsf.edu.
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.