Clinical situations that typically result in litigation and the variation in jury verdicts and awards across the nation.
Failed VBAC results in cerebral palsy
A 37-year-old California woman had previously delivereda child by cesarean for breech presentation. In 1995, duringher second pregnancy, her physicians advised her to try vaginaldelivery, and she agreed. At 42 weeks’ gestation she wasadmitted for induction. Despite her pushing for severalhours, the head remained at +2 to +3 station, at whichpoint the obstetrician recommended a repeat C/S. Thepatient refused. About an hour later a vacuum was appliedand fundal pressure given, which were unsuccessful. About ahalf hour later the physicianagain recommendedC/S, which the patientagain declined. Forcepswere attempted, but wereabandoned when theobstetrician felt he couldnot position them properly,and the patient againrefused a C/S. The physicianordered more fundalpressure, and when thenurses refused, the husbandapplied fundal pressure.After a few minutesthe woman consented toa C/S. The infant wasborn with a largecephalohematoma, facial bruising, swelling, and began havingseizures within 3 hours of delivery. She was subsequentlydiagnosed with cerebral palsy, right-sided paralysis,cognitive deficits, and learning disabilities.
In the lawsuit that followed this delivery, the patientalleged negligence by the obstetrician in that he failed to provide sufficient information to the patient aboutcesareans during labor. She also claimed he was negligentin attempting the vacuum, forceps, and fundal pressure.They alleged the pressure caused distortion of the internalcarotid artery, which caused the formation of an embolus,which in turn traveled to the right middle cerebral artery,causing an infarction in the brain.
Delay in diagnosingbreast cancer
A 36-year-old New York woman was diagnosed withstage IV breast cancer in 2003. About 5 years earlier,when she first became a patient of her gynecologist, shehad told him of her family history of breast cancer, fibrocysticbreast disease, and galactorea. The gynecologistexamined the patient repeatedly, but did not order anymammograms. In 2003, the patient requested a mammogramand she was diagnosed with cancer.
The patient sued her gynecologist, claiming that he wasnegligent in failing to order mammograms earlier.
The physician argued that without any indication, ascreening mammogram has not been shown to providebenefit for a 36-year-old, and that the care was within thestandard. A $1.25 million settlement was reached.
Unraveling preeclampsia: Insights into heterogeneity and intravascular inflammation
April 22nd 2024A recent study delved into the intricate clusters of term preeclampsia, shedding light on its diverse manifestations and the pivotal role of intravascular inflammation, paving the way for improved classification and management strategies.
Read More
Personalized opioid protocol for cesarean deliveries: Reduced prescriptions reported
April 19th 2024A recent suggests that implementing a personalized opioid prescription protocol significantly reduces total morphine milligram equivalents and the number of opioid tablets prescribed at discharge following cesarean delivery.
Read More
Long-term mortality risks for women with adverse pregnancy outcomes
April 19th 2024A recent study revealed that women who experience major adverse pregnancy outcomes face heightened long-term mortality risks, shedding light on the need for comprehensive understanding and preventative measures in women's health.
Read More