“The total energy intake may be one of the mechanisms, but it’s not the only one because a positive association existed even after adjusting for caloric intake,” Wang said.
Dose-response analyses demonstrated a nonlinear relationship between UPF consumption and mortality, with risk increasing at higher levels of intake. Associations were generally consistent across clinical subgroups, although stronger effects were observed among women living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods.
Potential biological pathways
Ultra-processed foods tend to be energy-dense and nutrient-poor, characteristics that may promote excess calorie intake, weight gain, and metabolic dysfunction. Consistent with this, adjustment for total energy intake substantially weakened the observed associations, suggesting that caloric excess may partially mediate the relationship between UPF intake and mortality.
“The average consumption is very similar to the U.K. population and also other U.S.-based studies like the Nurses’ Health Study,” Wang said. “I’d like to see more studies conducted among cancer survivors to confirm this, but the current evidence looks biologically reasonable now, particularly considering we have some ideas about the underlying biological mechanisms.”
The research team is conducting additional analyses to explore other potential pathways, including inflammation and insulin resistance. Planned studies will examine whether UPF consumption is associated with activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway in breast tumor tissue, as well as circulating inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and interleukin-6.
Processed meats emerge as a key contributor
When individual UPF subgroups were analyzed, processed meats showed the strongest association with adverse outcomes. Higher processed meat intake was associated with increased all-cause mortality, aligning with prior evidence linking processed meat consumption to cancer risk and poorer prognosis.
“Maybe it’s too complicated for breast cancer patients to think about how to reduce consumption of ultra-processed foods in general,” Wang said. “But we find processed meat is the top worst contributor among all UPF subgroups. So maybe a more detailed takeaway is to avoid this one thing.”
Clinical and public health implications
The findings are consistent with prior research suggesting an association between ultra-processed food intake and cancer-related mortality in other populations, indicating that underlying biological mechanisms may not be race-specific. However, this study uniquely highlights diet as a potentially modifiable factor in survivorship among Black women, an understudied and medically underserved population.
“Going back to cooking traditional meals can potentially save money and is generally better for your health,” said Elisa Bandera, professor and chief of the Department of Medicine at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and leader of the Women’s Circle of Health Follow-Up Study.
Although the observational design limits causal inference, the authors note that dietary patterns represent an actionable area for future survivorship interventions. Further studies in racially and ethnically diverse populations will be needed to confirm these findings and clarify how dietary guidance can be integrated into breast cancer survivorship care.
References
- Rutgers University-New Brunswick. For Black Women with Breast Cancer, Ultra-Processed Foods May Worsen Health Outcomes. Newswise. December 18, 2025. Accessed December 19, 2025. https://www.newswise.com/articles/for-black-women-with-breast-cancer-ultra-processed-foods-may-worsen-health-outcomes/?sc=mwhr&xy=10069075
- Wang T, Bandera EV, Perlstein M, et al. Ultra-processed foods consumption and subsequent mortality in a cohort of Black breast cancer survivors. eClinicalMedicine. 2025;91:103700. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103700