In this Q&A, experts explain how ACOG’s tailored prenatal care model supports flexibility, equity, and shared decision-making in pregnancy.
In May 2025, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) released a new Clinical Consensus that reimagines the traditional model of prenatal care. Titled "Tailored Prenatal Care Delivery for Pregnant Individuals," the guidance outlines a patient-centered framework that accounts for medical risk, social needs, and individual preferences. In the following Q&A, 3 authors behind the consensus—Mark Turrentine, MD; Alex Peahl, MD, MSc; and Julia Phillippi, PhD, CNM, FACNM, FAAN—discuss the motivation for the new framework, how telemedicine and shared decision-making can be effectively implemented, and the steps clinicians can take to ensure health equity and improve access for all pregnant individuals.
Mark Turrentine, MD
Mark Turrentine, MD: There has been a lot of evidence-based changes in the antenatal services provided over time; however, the format for delivery of these services has remained largely unchanged for almost 100 years. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated significant changes in prenatal care delivery, including adapting to targeted visit schedules, the use of telemedicine, and home monitoring. The major limitation of the traditional paradigm of prenatal care is the lack of flexibility. The traditional prenatal care model uses a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach. This new framework allows a foundation for the delivery of tailored care to be developed between the patient and their healthcare practitioner. This approach can allow the care plan to be adapted to the patient’s needs. For example, an individual who is with her second pregnancy may not need to be seen every 2 or 4 weeks during the middle of the pregnancy. Whereas, those individuals who need additional time for their clinical situation can be scheduled for longer visits.
Turrentine: All the same essential, evidence-based services are delivered. Just more efficiently. The targeted in-office visit times are structured to capture all of the evidence-based services. When in-person services are not needed or can be completed through alternative means, telemedicine is an effective means to continue contact with your patient. Hybrid models of prenatal care delivery (including both in-office and telemedicine contacts) have been demonstrated to provide cost savings for the patient (from less travel time, costs of travel, and time-off costs from work).
Alex Peahl, MD, MSc
Alex Peahl, MD, MSc: Shared decision-making is a central part of the new tailored care recommendations, and can support patient knowledge, autonomy, satisfaction, and birth outcomes. Tailoring care should begin with a comprehensive assessment of individuals’ pregnancy risks, including preexisting conditions, pregnancy history, and unmet social needs. These risks can be assessed through interviews or standardized questionnaires by any trained member of the care team. Maternity care professionals should also ask about individuals’ preferences and priorities for their care. With this information, pregnant individuals and their maternity care professionals can discuss and review flexible, safe, individualized options for their prenatal care delivery. It is important that shared decision-making be an evolving process and that care delivery decisions be revisited over the course of pregnancy. Decision grids and prenatal road maps are helpful tools for visualizing and selecting options. These resources will be available on the ACOG Prenatal Care Website in the upcoming weeks as part of the implementation resources section.
Peahl: In the United States, birthing people marginalized by racism, socioeconomic status, and geography experience suboptimal prenatal care, including barriers to access, discrimination and bias, and a negative care experience. Tailored prenatal care is designed to directly address these concerns: providing care more flexibly to improve access and elevating the patient voice through shared decision making to improve the care experience. To avoid widening existing inequities, clinicians and institutions should work to ensure all patients have access to the necessary tools for tailored care, such as broadband internet and devices for self-monitoring. “Standardizing choice,” creating processes for routinely offering available options to all pregnant individuals, can reduce bias in care delivery. Additionally, incorporating additional support people in shared decision-making discussions, such as family members or Community Health Workers, can help patients from marginalized groups overcome the inherent power differentials in clinical discussions.
Julia Phillippi, PhD, CNM, FACNM, FNAP, FAAN
Julia Phillippi, PhD, CNM, FACNM, FAAN: This new prenatal care model encourages ob-gyns and other maternity care professionals to talk with patients about their day-to-day stressors and needs and encourages care providers to ask what assistance or adjustments might be helpful for them. The care provider can then work with the full healthcare team to adjust prenatal care and assist that person in getting the health care and social services they may need for a healthy pregnancy, birth, and baby.
Social and structural drivers of health are daily pressures on individuals. For many families, the day-to-day juggle of meeting work expectations and family needs is already a strain. Adding prenatal care to that full schedule can be difficult. Customizing their care schedule around their needs and offering help for overcoming barriers, such as transportation, can make prenatal care not only possible but something to look forward to during a busy phase of life.
Rigid, one-size-fits-all models have not been meeting the needs of families in the United States. This new approach helps people receive the medical care and the overall assistance they need during pregnancy to optimize their health, outcomes, and experience.
Disclosures:
Turrnentine: None
Peahl: Consultant; Self; Mirvie, University Grants/Research Support; Self; Pulsenmore.
Phillippi: Advisory Committee/Board Member; Self; Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, Royalties; Self; Jones & Bartlett Learning (editor of Varney's Midwifery textbook), University Grants/Research Support; Self; Health Services & Research Administration, National Institute of Nursing Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Reference:
Tailored Prenatal Care Delivery for Pregnant Individuals: ACOG Clinical Consensus No. 8. Obstet Gynecol. 2025;145(5):565-577. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005889
Low recurrence found after uterine rupture in pregnancy
May 17th 2025A new study presented at the 2025 ACOG Annual Clinical & Scientific Meeting found that while recurrent uterine rupture is rare, patients with a history of rupture face a significantly increased subsequent risk of preterm delivery.
Read More
S4E1: New RNA platform can predict pregnancy complications
February 11th 2022In this episode of Pap Talk, Contemporary OB/GYN® sat down with Maneesh Jain, CEO of Mirvie, and Michal Elovitz, MD, chief medical advisor at Mirvie, a new RNA platform that is able to predict pregnancy complications by revealing the biology of each pregnancy. They discussed recently published data regarding the platform's ability to predict preeclampsia and preterm birth.
Listen
Self-screening tool for medication abortion found accurate and acceptable
May 17th 2025A new study presented at the 2025 ACOG Annual Clinical & Scientific Meeting reveals that a self-screening survey with educational videos enables most patients to determine medication abortion eligibility without an ultrasound.
Read More