There is an association between accelerated biological aging and preterm birth (PTB), according to a recent study published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology.1
Takeaways
- The study found a significant association between accelerated biological aging and an increased risk of preterm birth (PTB).
- Biological age was measured using the composite biomarker AgeAccelGrim, which reflects epigenetic modifications such as Cytosine-guanine nucleotide methylation.
- Participants with accelerated biological aging had higher odds of delivering preterm, specifically at under 37, 34, and 28 weeks' gestation.
- Shorter midtrimester transvaginal cervical lengths were observed in patients delivering under 34 weeks, suggesting a correlation between cervical length and PTB.
- The study recommends validating these findings through intervention-based randomized controlled trials to better understand the link between biological aging and PTB.
PTB is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among US neonates, with a rate of 10.47% reported in 2021. However, information about the pathophysiology of PTB remains lacking. However, data has indicated a potential link between histologic patterns and preterm birth.2
Currently established risk factors are associated with chronic stress which often leads to increased allostatic load.1 This can cause accelerated biological aging. However, it is unclear whether accelerated biological aging is directly linked to PTB.
Epigenetic modifications such as Cytosine-guanine nucleotide methylation (CpG DNA methylation [DNAm]) can be used to measure biological age. Health outcomes associated with biological age include heart disease, cancer, and reduced lifespan, indicating a need to understand this biological process.
To determine the association between accelerated biological aging and PTB, investigators conducted a prospective cohort study. Participants included singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies with high spontaneous preterm birth risk, determined by historical factors or current pregnancy complications.
Exclusion criteria included fetal aneuploidy or lethal fetal anomalies in pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, and being unable to provide consent in English or Spanish. The last menstrual period and ultrasound were used to determine gestational age.
Blood samples were obtained at enrollment and stored using a PAXgene blood DNA tube (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Waltham, MA). Additional data collected included maternal demographics, medical and obstetrical history, antenatal course, and pregnancy outcomes.
The AllPrep DNA/RNA/miRNA Universal Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) was used to isolate genomic DNA from frozen samples. Density distributions were utilized to visualize data. Biological aging was measured using the composite biomarker AgeAccelGrim.
DNAm beta values, female sex, and patient chronological age data was recorded. PTB at under 34 weeks’ gestation was reported as the primary outcome of the analysis.
Secondary outcomes included PTB at under 37 and 28 weeks’ gestation. The models included factors associated with PTB, such as low socioeconomic status, chronological age, estimated peripheral cell counts, and gestational age at blood sampling.