There is no evidence that plastic adhesive surgical drapes reduce surgical site infection rates, and some evidence that these drapes may increase infection rates, according to a third update of an intervention review and analysis conducted by the Cochrane Wounds Group.
There is no evidence that plastic adhesive surgical drapes reduce surgical site infection rates, and some evidence that these drapes may increase infection rates, according to a third update of an intervention review and analysis conducted by the Cochrane Wounds Group.1
Approximately 15% of clean surgery cases and 30% of contaminated surgery cases result in a surgical site infection. Surgical site infections are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost. In efforts to reduce this surgical complication, there have been many techniques developed to help make the incision site more sterile. Among these developments has been the introduction of plastic adhesive drapes, used alone or in combination with woven drapes or disposable paper drapes. However, the evidence showing that plastic adhesive drapes are effective has been conflicting, and there has been no recent systematic review to guide clinical practice, explained the researchers.1
This updated review involved 7 studies, 5 of which compared plastic adhesive drapes with no drapes and involved 3082 participants and 2 of which compared iodine-impregnated adhesive drapes with no drapes and involved 1113 participants; since the last update, no new studies were identified.
The researchers found that patients in the adhesive drape group experienced significantly more surgical site infections than patients in the no-drape group (risk ratio, 1.23; P = 0.03). Adhesive drapes that were iodine-impregnated did not effect the surgical site infection rate (risk ratio, 1.03; P = 0.89). Despite some evidence showing that adhesive surgical drapes increase surgical site infection rates, the length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the adhesive drape group and the non-adhesive drape group.
“Further trials may be justified, using blinded outcome assessment to examine the effect of adhesive drapes on surgical site infection, based on different wound classifications,” concluded the researchers. Surgical wound classifications are shown in the Table.
Table. Surgical Wound Classification
Data from University of Connecticut Health Center.2
1. Webster J, Alghamdi A. Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2013;1. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006353.pub3.
2. University of Connecticut Health Center. Surgical wound classification. Available at: http://nursing.uchc.edu/unit_manuals/perioperative/or/docs/Surgical%20Wound%20Classification.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2013.
Phase 2b safety data for Sildenafil Cream against FSAD reported
August 26th 2024In a recent study published in The Journal of Sexual Medicine, Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% was indicated as safe and well-tolerated for use against female sexual arousal disorder in healthy premenopausal women.
Read More
Study: Pelvic floor dilator reduces pelvic floor muscle injury during vaginal delivery
August 6th 2024A new pilot study published in the International Urogynecology Journal found that Materna Medical’s Prep Device, a pelvic floor dilator, reduced full levator ani muscle avulsion during vaginal delivery in first-time mothers.
Read More
Similar success rates for synthetic and nonsynthetic slings in SUI treatment
July 31st 2024A study found that both synthetic and nonsynthetic slings show similar success rates for treating stress urinary incontinence in women, with synthetic slings demonstrating improved operative outcomes and reduced complications.
Read More
First hysterectomy using miniaturized MIRA Surgical System performed
July 30th 2024Virtual Incision Corporation has announced the successful performance of the first benign hysterectomy using their miniaturized robotic-assisted surgery device, MIRA, in a clinical trial assessing its safety and efficacy.
Read More