When comparing preterm babies’ diets that consisted of either exclusively human milk or 1 that contained cow milk products, investigators of a randomized, controlled study published in Early Human Development found no important differences in body composition at term.
Takeaways
- Equal Body Composition: Study finds no significant body composition differences in preterm infants fed human milk vs. cow milk products at term.
- Similar Outcomes: Both diets—human milk and cow milk products—show comparable results in preterm baby growth, challenging previous assumptions.
- Consistent Nutrition: Infants on different diets exhibit similar feed tolerance, breastfeeding rates, and nutritional intake, highlighting consistency in health outcomes.
- Unanswered Questions: Research emphasizes the need for further studies to determine the functional benefits of exclusive human milk diets for very preterm babies.
- Dietary Comparisons: Study underscores the uncertainty around the optimal diet for preterm infants, sparking continued exploration in neonatal nutrition.
The study authors stated preterm infants that receive only human milk, compared to infants that receive mostly preterm formula, have lower weight and non-adipose tissue mass (N-ATM) by term. Seeking to determine if these respective diets would affect body composition, the investigators conducted a randomized, multicenter, open-label, controlled study in 4 United Kingdom centers. The study’s primary endpoint was body composition (adipose tissue mass [ATM] and N-ATM) at term.
From March 2018 to September 2019, preterm infants below 30 weeks gestation were enrolled. Major or life-threatening abnormalities, inability to randomize within 72 hours of birth, bovine milk exposure prior to randomization, or likelihood of transfer to a different hospital before 34 weeks postmenstrual age were exclusion criteria.
Infants received their own mother’s milk (OMM) and were randomized to exclusive human milk (“Ready to Feed Human Preterm 26” formula, RTF 26; Prolacta Biosciences), the intervention arm, or preterm formula, the control arm, making up for shortfalls until an enteral feed volume of 150 ml / kg per day was reached. The human milk-based fortifier (Prolacta Biosciences) was added after the feed volume of 150 ml / kg per day was reached (at least 50 ml was OMM) in the intervention arm. Enteral intake maximum was 165 ml / kg per day, providing a protein intake of 3.7–4.6 g /kg per day, carbohydrate intake of 8.2–12.2 g / kg per day and fat intake of 8.2–9.2 g / kg per day.
Standard cow milk-based fortifier was added in the control arm once an enteral feed volume of 150 ml / kg per day was reached. In this group, the maximum enteral intake was 165 ml / kg per day, which provided a protein intake of 3.7 to 4.6 g / kg per day, a fat intake of 6.3 to 6.4 g / kg per day, and a carbohydrate intake of 13 to 14.7 g /kg per day. Trial intervention ended at 34 weeks postmenstrual age.
After randomization, exclusions or those lost to follow-up, 12 infants from the control arm and 15 infants from the intervention arm were analyzed. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess body composition, carried out in natural sleep at term. Total adipose tissue volume was defined as the sum of 6 discrete depots: superficial-subcutaneous non-abdominal, superficial-subcutaneous abdominal, deep-subcutaneous abdominal, deep-subcutaneous non-abdominal, internal-abdominal, and internal non-abdominal.