That's the conclusion of a recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine (5/11/06). Based on a review of random samples of closed-claim files at five malpractice insurance companies in four regions across the United States, the study's researchers found that "portraits of a malpractice system that is stricken with frivolous litigation are overblown."
That's the conclusion of a recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine (5/11/06). Based on a review of random samples of closed-claim files at five malpractice insurance companies in four regions across the United States, the study's researchers found that "portraits of a malpractice system that is stricken with frivolous litigation are overblown."
The researchers found that meritless claims-those that did not involve injury or error-were not generally compensated. Of the 1,452 claims reviewed, researchers found that 3% involved no verifiable medical injuries, and the vast majority of these cases (84%) went unpaid. Similarly, among the 37% of reviewed claims that involved an injury but were not associated with error, 72% were not compensated. In contrast, 73% of claims involving injury and error were paid.
Although the cost of defending against frivolous claims is not trivial, eliminating claims that involved error would decrease costs only up to 16%. The researchers concluded that "moves to curb frivolous litigation, if successful, will have a relatively limited effect on the caseload and costs of litigation. The vast majority of resources go toward resolving and paying claims that involve errors. A higher-value target for reform than discouraging claims that do not belong in the system would be streamlining the processing of claims that do belong."
Get the latest clinical updates, case studies, and expert commentary in obstetric and gynecologic care. Sign up now to stay informed.