Hand Hygiene and the Hawthorne Effect

Article

If someone is watching, clinicians will wash their hands. But what happens when big brother isn’t there?

If someone is watching, clinicians will wash their hands. But what happens when big brother isn’t there?

Pertinent Points

- Hand hygiene is three times higher among health care workers when they think someone is watching.

- A Canadian study found that hand washing diminished significantly when auditors were not visible.

Researchers in Canada found health care workers were three times more likely to clean their hands when auditors were visible, as opposed to when no auditor was present. The finding suggests that publicly reported hospital hand hygiene compliance rates are likely not accurate, the authors concluded. The findings appear online in the BMJ Quality & Safety Journal.

"The magnitude of what we found calls into question the accuracy of directly observed hand hygiene rates and the usefulness of measuring and reporting them," said senior author Michael Gardam, MD, Director, Infection Prevention and Control, University Health Network and Women's College Hospital, Toronto. "That said, human auditing of hand hygiene has been helpful to draw attention to this important preventative measure-we just can't stop focusing on it because our posted rates are not nearly as high as we think they are."

For the study, researchers used unidentified auditors in white lab coats along with soap dispensers that transmitted a signal each time the levers were pushed. 

When an auditor was around, the study recorded 3.75 hand washes per hour, but when no one was visible the hourly rate dropped to 1.48 hand washes. Even more telling was when the researchers went back and looked at the hand washing rates the week prior to the auditors making their appearance. For that period, the soap dispenser data showed the rate was just 1.07 per hour.

The Hawthorne effect, or the tendency to change behavior when someone is aware of an observer, was perfectly demonstrated in this study, the authors concluded. They suggest, however, that more research is needed to understand the magnitude and duration of the effect on hand hygiene.

In the meantime: Wash your hands as if someone is watching. Gardam suggested in a news release that staff need to come up with ways to support the effort and highlighted the use of public unit reporting, pledges, and posters as ways to hold each other accountable.

Related Videos
Understanding combined oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk | Image Credit: health.ucdavis.edu
Why doxycycline PEP lacks clinical data for STI prevention in women
The importance of nipocalimab’s FTD against FNAIT | Image Credit:  linkedin.com
Enhancing cervical cancer management with dual stain | Image Credit: linkedin.com
Fertility treatment challenges for Muslim women during fasting holidays | Image Credit: rmanetwork.com
Understanding the impact of STIs on young adults | Image Credit: providers.ucsd.edu.
CDC estimates of maternal mortality found overestimated | Image Credit: rwjms.rutgers.edu.
Study unveils maternal mortality tracking trends | Image Credit: obhg.com
How Harmonia Healthcare is revolutionizing hyperemesis gravidarum care | Image Credit: hyperemesis.org
Unveiling gender disparities in medicine | Image Credit:  findcare.ahn.org.
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.