Interventions to promote mammography screening don't seem to work

Article

Neither tailored nor targeted interventions have any significant effect on mammography screening rates, according to two studies published in the Mar. 5 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Neither tailored nor targeted interventions have any significant effect on mammography screening rates, according to two studies published in the Mar. 5 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

In the first study, Sally W. Vernon, PhD, from the University of Texas-Houston School of Public Health, and colleagues randomly assigned 5,500 female veterans (≥52 years) to one of three strategies to increase mammography screening: tailored and targeted, targeted only, and a survey-only control group. The investigators found that neither intervention had any significant effect on mammography rates.

In the second study, Deborah J. del Junco, PhD, from the same institution, and colleagues randomly assigned 21,340 women (≥52 years) to one of five groups as part of a trial to promote mammography screening: groups 1-3 received baseline surveys and groups 1-2 received varied personalization materials. Group 4 received a post-intervention survey at year 1 and group 5 received a post-intervention survey at year 2, both of which coincided with follow-up surveys to groups 1-3.

“Groups 1-3 were similar throughout the trial in participation and correlates of mammography screening. No statistically significant survey cueing effects or differences between nonparticipants and participants across groups were observed,” del Junco’s team found Vernon SW, del Junco DJ, Tiro JA , et al. Promoting regular mammography screening II. Results from a randomized controlled trial in US women veterans. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:347-348. Published online at doi:10.1093/jnci/djn026.

del Junco DJ, Vernon SW, Coan SP, et al. Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:333-346. Published online at doi:10.1093/jnci/djn027.

Newsletter

Get the latest clinical updates, case studies, and expert commentary in obstetric and gynecologic care. Sign up now to stay informed.

Recent Videos
Neal Barnard, MD, FACC, highlights AMA's new breast cancer prevention guidelines | Image Credit: pcrm.org.
Zachary Wagner, PhD, discusses the harms of bias in reproductive care | Image Credit: ornsife.usc.edu.
Ciera Kirkpatrick, PhD, shows how TikTok is transforming cervical cancer awareness | Image Credit: linkedin.com.
Maria Gallo, PhD, discusses high attendance at crisis pregnancy centers | Image Credit: © x.com.
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.