Minor Cosmetic Services Deemed Safe, BUT . . .


More and more OB/GYN practices are supplementing their medical services with aesthetic services. New data show they are safe, but there's a caveat.

Perhaps not a trend but certainly more common is the expansion of services-namely aesthetic-offered at OB/GYN practices. Some of the more popular services seem to be injectable neurotoxins or fillers.

These popular noninvasive and minimally invasive cosmetic procedures are safe, with very few adverse events occurring, researchers reported in JAMA Dermatology. However, this safety determination is based on board-certified dermatologists performing the procedures.

Pertinent Points

- Popular cosmetic procedures are safe, with very low adverse event rates occurring, when performed by board-certified dermatologists.

- The adverse event rates are unknown when these procedures are performed by physicians with specialties other than dermatology.

The study followed the outcomes of patients who had minor cosmetic procedures performed by board-certified dermatologists. The research focused on common cosmetic offerings, including those that utilized laser and energy devices and injectable neurotoxins and fillers.

Researchers collected data from eight cosmetic dermatology centers over the course of 13 weeks. More than 20,000 procedures were included in the study, with only 36 procedures resulting in at least one adverse event, translating to an adverse event rate of just 0.18%. All total, there were 48 adverse events, with an associated adverse event rate of 0.24%.

The most common adverse events reported were minor and involved lumps or nodules, persistent redness or bruising, skin darkening, and erosions or ulcerations, the authors reported. These problems tended to resolve quickly, and there were no serious adverse events reported.

Procedures involving the cheeks were the most likely to result in an adverse event. Nasolabial and eyelid procedures were the next most common to end in an adverse event, the authors said.

“In the hands of well-trained dermatologists, these procedures are safe, with aggregate adverse event rates of well under 1 percent. Moreover, most adverse events are minor and rapidly remitting, and serious adverse events were not seen. Patients seeking such procedures can be reassured that, at least in the hands of trained board-certified dermatologists, they pose minimal risk,” the study concludes.

The study design did not include physicians who are not board-certified dermatologists, although other physicians, including OB/GYNs, are known to provide many of these common aesthetic procedures. The adverse even rate for such procedures performed by OB/GYNs is unknown.

Related Videos
The significance of the Supreme Court upholding mifepristone access | Image Credit: unchealth.org
One year out: Fezolinetant displays patient satisfaction for managing hot flashes | Image Credit: sutterhealth.org
Addressing maternal health inequities: Insights from CDC's Wanda Barfield | Image Credit: cdc.gov
Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in brachial plexus birth Injury | Image Credit: shrinerschildrens.org
Innovations in prenatal care: Insights from ACOG 2024 | Image Credit:  uofmhealth.org.
Unlocking therapeutic strategies for menopausal cognitive decline | Image Credit: uclahealth.org.
Navigating menopause care: Expert insights from ACOG 2024 | Image Credit: mayo.edu.
raanan meyer, md
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.