Instead, he urged clinicians to exercise “clinical vigilance” when prescribing hormone therapy, especially in patients with a personal or family history of autoimmune conditions. “Clinicians probably need to discuss [this] with patients, require shared decision-making, and educate patients regarding the symptoms of autoimmune disease,” Jiang said. He also recommended close monitoring for any new or worsening autoimmune symptoms that may occur during therapy.
Future research directions
According to Jiang, more research is needed to clarify how factors such as hormone formulation, dosage, and timing affect autoimmune disease risk. “We need more studies to look into different dosages and different regimens, such as estrogen alone vs estrogen plus progestins,” he noted. "We also want to look at the time of initiation of hormone therapy to see if the timing hypothesis also applies to this subject.”
Jiang also suggested examining whether hormone therapy might worsen disease severity in women with existing autoimmune conditions or contribute to the onset of other autoimmune diseases.
Reflecting on lessons from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study, he drew parallels between early misconceptions about hormone therapy and the evolving understanding of its risks and benefits. “The WHI findings in 2002 caused hormone therapy phobia,” he said. “But later, when we stratified the data by age, we realized that the timing hypothesis is true: If you initiate hormone therapy in early menopausal women, the benefits can outweigh the risks. Probably the same thing applies to autoimmune disease.”
He concluded that while the current findings raise important questions, “it’s too premature to say anything definitive. There’s no yes-or-no answer yet. It’s not set in stone.”