New national standards for rating doctors to be developed

Article

Physicians’ groups and insurers recently agreed to develop a national set of standards for measuring doctors’ performance. The agreement represents a significant step in resolving a longstanding dispute about current rating practices. Physicians charge that health plans focus too much on cost rather than quality of care and that the rankings are often inaccurate, according to The New York Times (4/2/08). Leading physician groups, including the American Medical Association, American College of Surgeons, and American College of Physicians, signed on to the agreement, along with major health insurers, such as Aetna and United Healthcare. The broad coalition endorsing the new plan also includes consumer, labor, and employer organizations.

Physicians’ groups and insurers recently agreed to develop a national set of standards for measuring doctors’ performance. The agreement represents a significant step in resolving a longstanding dispute about current rating practices. Physicians charge that health plans focus too much on cost rather than quality of care and that the rankings are often inaccurate, according to The New York Times (4/2/08). Leading physician groups, including the American Medical Association, American College of Surgeons, and American College of Physicians, signed on to the agreement, along with major health insurers, such as Aetna and United Healthcare. The broad coalition endorsing the new plan also includes consumer, labor, and employer organizations.

According to the agreement, the standards to be developed will adhere to four major criteria:

  • Measures should be meaningful to consumers and reflect the importance of patient-centered care.

  • Physicians and physician organizations should have input to these programs and the methods used to stratify performance. They should also have access to the information collected and be given notice before individual information is released.

  • Measures and methodology should be transparent, valid, accessible, and understandable by consumers, physicians and other clinicians.

  • Measures should be based on national standards, primarily standards endorsed by the National Quality Forum (NQF). Standards from other groups and organizations may be used, but they will be replaced by NQF standards when available.
Related Videos
Why doxycycline PEP lacks clinical data for STI prevention in women
The importance of nipocalimab’s FTD against FNAIT | Image Credit:  linkedin.com
Enhancing cervical cancer management with dual stain | Image Credit: linkedin.com
Fertility treatment challenges for Muslim women during fasting holidays | Image Credit: rmanetwork.com
Understanding the impact of STIs on young adults | Image Credit: providers.ucsd.edu.
CDC estimates of maternal mortality found overestimated | Image Credit: rwjms.rutgers.edu.
Study unveils maternal mortality tracking trends | Image Credit: obhg.com
How Harmonia Healthcare is revolutionizing hyperemesis gravidarum care | Image Credit: hyperemesis.org
Unveiling gender disparities in medicine | Image Credit:  findcare.ahn.org.
Exploring the intersection of heart health and women's health | Image Credit: cedars-sinai.org
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.