Prenatal vasa previa diagnosis is not associated with perinatal death, according to a recent study published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology.
Takeaways
- Vasa previa, characterized by unprotected fetal vessels traveling through amniotic membranes to the cervix, is linked with significant perinatal mortality when not diagnosed.
- Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of vasa previa offers a critical advantage. It allows for early diagnosis, enabling patients to undergo cesarean delivery before membrane rupture, which has shown improved outcomes.
- A systematic review was conducted to assess perinatal death rates in prenatally diagnosed vasa previa cases. Data extraction encompassed various parameters such as publication details, pregnancy specifics, and mortality causes.
- Out of 1297 pregnant women from 113 studies analyzed, 13 perinatal deaths were reported. Only 6 of these deaths were directly attributed to vasa previa.
- The study's conclusion emphasizes the importance of awareness about the relatively low risk (0.5%) of perinatal death attributed to vasa previa after prenatal diagnosis.
Vasa previa presents in pregnant patients as unprotected fetal vessels travelling through the amniotic membranes to the cervix and is associated with significant perinatal mortality when undiagnosed. Membrane rupture leads to fetal blood loss or exsanguination, with approximately 56% of cases resulting in perinatal death.
An ultrasound diagnosis of vasa previa allows the condition to be diagnosed prenatally, giving patients the opportunity to undergo a cesarean delivery before membrane rupture. This has led to significantly improved outcomes when vasa previa is diagnosed prenatally, but some studies have continued to report a small mortality among prenatally diagnosed patients.
Investigators conducted a review to determine the rate of perinatal death in prenatally diagnosed vasa previa. Studies evaluating perinatal mortality and cause of mortality in patients with vasa previa diagnosed before labor were included in the analysis.
Exclusion criteria included being a conference abstract, editorial, review article, letter, or book chapter, not being published in English, French, or Spanish, not reporting perinatal survival, not separately reporting prenatally diagnosed patients, unavailable full text, and patients receiving fetoscopic laser ablation.
Databases consulted for studies from January 1, 1987, to January 1, 2023, included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. Titles and abstracts were screened by 2 independent reviewers, with a third consulted to resolve conflicts. Afterward, the process was repeated for full text screening.
Data extracted included publications year, institute, country, total number of patients, number of twin or multiple pregnancies, number of pregnancies conceived using assisted reproductive technology, stillbirth, neonatal mortality, and cause of death. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.