A new retrospective study published in Obstetrics & Gynecology shows that robotics don’t improve benign hysterectomy outcomes and, in fact, increase cost of the surgery.
A new retrospective study published in Obstetrics & Gynecology shows that robotics don’t improve benign hysterectomy outcomes and, in fact, increase cost of the surgery.
The retrospective research-one of the first such nationwide studies-was derived from analysis of data in an insurance database. Information on surgical outcomes in more than 15,000 women who underwent minimally invasive benign hysterectomies from 2009 to 2010 was included. Half the patients had a robotic-assisted procedure and the other had conventional laparoscopy.
Researchers from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center found that complication rates were comparable for robotic (8.80%) versus conventional laparoscopic procedures (8.85%) Patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy were less likely to need a blood transfusion than those undergoing laparoscopy (P<.001), but more likely to have postoperative pneumonia (P=.005). Compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy, the cost of a robotic procedure averaged $2,489 more.
The authors note the need for more research on robotics, including the impact of the surgeon’s training on outcomes and longer-term patient follow-up on the procedures.
Be to sure to check out our special tech section in the October issue of Contemporary OB/GYN.
To get weekly advice for today's Ob/Gyn, subscribe to the Contemporary Ob/Gyn Special Delivery.
Treating heavy menstrual bleeding: Levonorgestrel system vs combined oral contraceptives
November 8th 2023In a recent study, patients who were treated for heavy menstrual bleeding with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system had similar changes in bleeding-related quality of life as those using combined oral contraceptives for treatment.
Read More