OR WAIT 15 SECS
Will the employers-physicians, hospitals or other covered entities-also be held accountable and subject to prosecution? That's what a 2005 Department of Justice memo seemed to imply.
...will the employers-physicians, hospitals or other covered entities-also be held accountable and subject to prosecution? That's what a 2005 Department of Justice memo seemed to imply. However, as the department begins to prosecute its third criminal case involving privacy violations, legal experts believe that as long as covered entities play by the rules, they may be spared from prosecution.
In each of the three cases, the privacy breaches involved employees. In 2004, a phlebotomist was charged with stealing the personal information of a cancer patient at Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and incurring $9,000 in charges to a credit card he obtained using the patient's identity. In 2005, an employee of a Texas doctor's office was convicted of stealing the confidential medical information of an FBI agent and trying to sell it to someone who she believed was a drug trafficker. In 2006, an employee of the Cleveland Clinic is accused of obtaining confidential medical information for 1,100 patients and selling it.