Levels of exposure that are defined as 'safe' by the official limits, are actually having non-trivial adverse effects, according to new reports.
A new report issued by the Biodiversity Research Institute recommends a revision of the guidelines on the amount of fish women consume during pregnancy.
One report indicates that studies have found adverse effects below exposure levels recently considered ‘safe’ and states: “Several of these studies clearly show that the consumption of ordinary amounts of fish with higher mercury levels can cause health risks to the developing foetus and children.”
"Levels of exposure that are defined as safe by the official limits, are actually having adverse effects," said Dr. Edward Groth, author of one of two new reports.“"These are not trivial effects, these are significant effects. There does appear to be evidence now, fairly persuasive evidence, that adverse effects occur from normal amounts of seafood consumption."
Together, the reports encourage the adoption of a new benchmark for safe mercury consumption at approximately 25% of what is currently recommended in the U.S.
Polling Software
|
Survey Software
Tell us what you think about the research, the opportunity to revise the guidelines, and whether you’ll change the way you advise patients in the ‘Comments’ section below.
S1E4: Dr. Kristina Adams-Waldorf: Pandemics, pathogens and perseverance
July 16th 2020This episode of Pap Talk by Contemporary OB/GYN features an interview with Dr. Kristina Adams-Waldorf, Professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Adjunct Professor in Global Health at the University of Washington (UW) School of Medicine in Seattle.
Listen
Identifying gaps in syphilis treatment and prenatal care among pregnant individuals
May 17th 2024Preventing congenital syphilis comes down to quick diagnosis and treatment of the infection in pregnancy, and the number of missed opportunities to do so in the United States continues to grow.
Read More