
Pros and Cons of C-Section on Demand in Low Risk Patients
OBGYN.net Conference CoverageFrom First Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology & Infertility Prague CZECH REPUBLIC - October, 1999
Also available --             en 
Professor       Richard Paul:       "My name is Richard Paul, and I am from the University of Southern       California in Los Angeles."
       
       Professor       Sabaratnam Arulkumaran:       "And I'm Arulkumaran, Arul for short, from the University of       Nottingham in the U.K."
       
       Professor       Richard Paul:       "This afternoon, we would like to discuss the topic of cesarean       section today, some of the trends that we see, and ask the question - have       we gone too far in our demands to reduce the cesarean section rate which       is seemingly a great demand put upon the obstetrician/gynecologist by       organizations?"
       
       Professor       Sabaratnam Arulkumaran:       "I think the problem was mainly put on the physicians because it was       perceived that in the private sector the cesarean sections were done for       monetary reasons. Currently, the issue is becoming a broader one because       the women themselves want a cesarean section on request. There is debate       about whether it's a woman's right to request a cesarean section.       Discussions surround what is a woman's right as opposed to a privilege,       and what is society's right. One of the concerns is the limited budget to       provide health care services. The C-section that is done on request might       consume more money and may even block up the theaters necessary to do       emergency procedures. Many organizations like to consider C-section on       request as a privilege and to monitor the situation to see how it       develops."
       
       Professor       Richard Paul:       "My view is that an informed woman certainly has the right to request       a cesarean section. I think there's current debate relating on whether or       not cost effectiveness may not be about equal for a cesarean birth, at       least in the United States. Clearly in my opinion, the baby has a less       traumatic exit from the mother by cesarean birth. It's generally accepted       that the cesarean is associated with more morbidity for the mother. But       isn't the question then - can the mother accept increased morbidity if she       believes this is best for her baby as it's being born, and perhaps as we       now understand, better for her later in life as it relates to late       complications - less pelvic floor disorders, stress incontinence, and that       type of issue. So we are going to see this debate occur, and I think we       will see the demand for cesarean increase, and that will occur quite       rapidly."
       
       Professor       Sabaratnam Arulkumaran:       "In one of the surveys which they conducted in the U.K., they looked       at whether the decision to do a cesarean section is made mainly by the       physician or in participation with the woman. Increasingly the       obstetrician is willing to discuss the issue and a joint decision is made.       I think that is a right direction in which things should move in terms of       clinical practice. The advantages and disadvantages of any procedure       should be explained to the woman. She should be allowed to have an       informed choice in the matter. I do not know how it works in the United       States."
       
       Professor       Richard Paul::       "I think that the public is becoming more and more aware of the       safety of cesarean sections - it's a safe operation. Particularly more and       more women are requesting an elective cesarean as opposed to one trial of       labor after prior section; the whole arena is changing. With women       beginning to predominate as the providers, I think many of them, in fact,       also tend to feel that cesarean is the preferable method of giving birth.       This will no doubt have a major impact over the next few years, regarding       the availability of that service, and the willingness of the obstetrician       to go ahead and do a cesarean at the patient's request. I think one of the       things that we believe medically is that there's more risk with cesarean.       But when you look at the safety of the operation - it's an incredibly safe       operation today. In my opinion, much of what has happened to drive this       demand to decrease the cesarean rate is driven on an economic basis. It       has been promoted by lobbies from insurance companies and by the Federal       Government in order to limit the cost as opposed to really what's       medically correct."       
Newsletter
Get the latest clinical updates, case studies, and expert commentary in obstetric and gynecologic care. Sign up now to stay informed.




















