I once was dealing with the purchase of equipment from an ultrasound vendor. We had worked with our current vendor for over a decade and had purchased over $2 million worth of equipment. Their machines were tremendous and provided excellent images for our patients in our maternal-fetal medicine practice. However, for a fair number of devices, their salespeople offered us no significant pricing breaks. We had little communication on our imaging experience, sonographer education, and lack of shared goals. We felt our practice was not being valued.
We opened the bidding to 2 separate companies. This took precious time to participate in machine demonstrations and learn about this new and different equipment. However, as our practice was large, these 2 companies gave incredibly competitive pricing to open the door to our practice and build a relationship. We purchased equipment from both vendors and ended our long-standing relationship with our first and only ultrasound vendor.
We wanted to be treated like the customer they wanted, not the customer they had.
In many circumstances, this is 1 of the critical issues in losing a provider. We will wine and dine someone to come into our city and let them get to know other providers and staff. However, we will not take the provider and spouse out annually to show them an appreciation for their work, listen to concerns, address issues leading to burnout, and ask them about future goals to hope they stay. Unfortunately, this lack of strategic involvement is unwise. The cost of turnover is staggering, with the average cost ranging from $500,000 to $1 million per physician.
Engagement of the person is the key to retention. Systems hire recruiters, but why not professional staff engagement officers? Smaller practices should have owners take a chief role in engagement. For provider engagement, a plan is needed and should be documented and followed. (See sidebar).
The Coker group has put to gether a list of 12 dimensionsof physician engagement and a tool to measure the engagement, including the following1:
1. physician connectedness,
3. quality of staff relationships,
5. professional development,
9. support of external demands,
10. patient care and experience,
Coker’s tool for measuring physician engagement is a quantitative measurement of a qualitative experience and hence is limited in its application. Nonetheless, it is easy to garner feedback and upfront responses when administered, especially in an anonymous fashion.
Retention is important but recognizing burnout as a more insidious hazard in the workplace is critical. Professionally, burnout leads to decreased quality of care, increased medical errors, decreased productivity, and provider turnover.
Organizations should promote system-level solutions for retention and well-being. Mayo Clinic has announced9 organizational strategies for physician well-being.2
1. Acknowledge and assess the problem.
Staff appreciate dialogue with their leadership, and it is critical that discussions are candid and heard. After that, routine measurement of physician well-being is essential to assess and act upon deficiencies.
2. Harness the power of leadership.
Behaviors of leaders are critical to the well-being of the positions they lead. Leadership selection is crucial. Leaders must then be developed, prepared, and equipped for their roles. The effective leader recognizes the unique talents of the physician team. Evidence suggests that professionals working at least 20% of their time within their fields of strengths are at much lower risk for burnout.3
3. Develop and implement targeted interventions.
Spreading these concepts out to your entire clinical team is important. Assemble a team for action and invite insight from physicians/providers. Form focus groups and have leaders steer facility change based upon the gathered information.